AMC In Depth
Intro
After a few days of recuperation time, it was ultimately decided that the characterization of deinococcus sonorensis was effectively over for us, and we would be completely pivoting back onto the AMC project, as well as a more in depth approach into qPCR and investigating reference genes and their stability.
Results & Discussion
To help further understand the activated methyl cycle, it was drawn out in skeletal structures, as shown above (note: does not contain all components of AMC). As the cell goes through the cycle, pieces of each are taken and substituted and create the substrates present in AMC. While we would have liked to start back up with RNA isolation and qPCR procedures for this project, there were issues with both e. coli and D. caeni samples that prvented us from doing so.With the addition on the qPCR project we are now adding to the workload and having to better understand the process of qPCR and also what reference genes would best benefit us and the lab. Given a list of reference genes, we were able to narrow down the full list down to era, fabD, ftsZ, groEL, rho, ropB and rpoD. This was done by selecting only those with a standard deviation of +/- .7 or lower. However era and ftsZ do not have the standard deviation data so we may end up cutting those. We also looked into each of the genes and where they come from/what they are associated with in order to get a better idea of each gene.
Conclusion
We will be testing each reference gene listed above with qPCR and also continuing the RNA isolation of e. coli and D. caeni into the summer and hopefully be done with these projects before the conclusion of the summer semester.
Comments
Post a Comment